Becoming a Prison Officer :: Papers

It's a tough job with unsociable hours, rare contact with the outside world and a less than impressive pay package. So why would anyone want to be a prison officer? I am asked to place my coat and bag in a small cloakroom area, and am ushered to a small room where my pockets are searched and body is frisked. I find this 'procedure' quite uncomfortable, but think myself lucky that these rigorous checks aren't performed everyday. I am given a white sticker with 'visitor' on it and am promptly told to 'wear it at all times' so I can be easily identified. I am let through a series of grey cold steel doors, opened by a large bunch of jangling keys and am greeted by the prison officer I have come to interview with a firm, almost predictable handshake. Carol Tomlin has been a prison officer at Bournemouth Magistrates Court for thirteen years. She works in twelve hour shifts, five, possibly six times a week in the 'cells' in the basement of the court. Her only interaction is with the prisoners themselves and her fellow officers. " Sometimes I don't see daylight all week, by the time I leave work its dark outside and when I get up its also dark-it can be quite a strain". To look at Carol you wouldn't think that her job was a 'strain'. She is far removed from the stereotypical prison officer that is synonymous with polished black boots and a stern air of authority. She has long blonde hair that is neatly tied up with a red flower hair band. She is tall at 6ft, but not overpowering, as her smile and welcoming stance assures. Her bright blue and pink make-up mirrors her personality and enthusiasm for the job she calls 'her life and her passion'. "The job is hard, but I do love it, you get a great deal of job satisfaction when you have helped somebody with a problem. Whether that means getting through to someone about their drug addiction, or

British Monarchy and comparison with Turkey

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is a constitutional and hereditary monarchy. In practice, it is a democracy operating by a parliament system (a system in which supreme authority is held by the legislature) under a figurehead sovereign who â€Å"reigns but does not rule. † The British parliament system, with a head of state who is not the head of government, has been a model for many other countries. Wales and England (excluding Greater London) are divided into counties and metropolitan counties, which are heavily populated areas. All counties are subdivided into districts.Each county and district has an elected council (Coleman, 2006). A government reorganization, effective in 1974, greatly reduced the number of local administrative units and redrew county boundaries. Thesis Statement: This study scrutinizes the differences and similarities between British monarchy and the government system of Turkey; thus, it also figures out the differences between c onstitutional monarchy and republic and gives idea of what absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy are. II. Discussion A. Differences and Similarities o British Monarchy Constitution.The British constitution is not to be found in any single written document. It is a body of rules consisting partly of written material and partly of established principles and practices known as conventions. It includes historic documents such as Magna Charta, the Petition of Right 91628), and the Bill of Rights (1689). It includes certain basic statutes (laws). And it includes rules established by common law (Winter, 2003). Rules of the constitution can be changed only by an act of parliament or through establishment of a new convention by usage and general acceptance.Composition of Government. Parliament, although supreme, governs in the name of the Crown (monarch). There are three organs of government—legislature, executive, and judiciary. ? The legislature consists of the two house o f Parliament and the Queen (whose formal assent must be given before a bill becomes a law). ? The executive consists of the cabinet and other ministers (officials) of the Crown; administrative departments staffed by Civil Service employees and usually headed by ministers; local authorities; and boards created by statute to operate various industries and services.The Queen is formally the head of the executive body. The ministry, representing the political party in control of Parliament, is called Her Majesty’s government or the government (Crowl, 2002). ? The judiciary, of which the Queen is nominally the head, is independent of both the legislature and the executive. Crown. The inheritance of the throne goes to the eldest son and his heirs, or if there is no son the eldest daughter and her heirs, or if there are no children to the eldest brother and his heirs. Elizabeth II succeeded her father, George VI, in 1952.The Queen acts in governmental matters only on the advice of h er ministers, and by convention may not refuse to act on such advice. Not only her approval but her participation is required in the conduct of government. She summons and dissolves Parliament, approve bills, and signs state papers. She approves the appointment of all ministers of the Crown and gives her consent to the formation of a cabinet. In doing so, she sometimes has a choice in selecting a new prime minister. In consulting with her ministers she may exercise some influence over policy (Morgan, 2004).Because of the sovereign’s central role in the function of government, British law provides for the appointment of a regent to act in the event that the sovereign is unable to perform the responsibilities of the Crown. As formal head of the British Commonwealth of Nations, the Queen is the symbol of Commonwealth unity. In addition to her roles in government, she is head of the armed forces and temporal head of the Church of England. The Privy Council assist the Queen in iss uing Orders in Council and royal proclamations. It is largely an honorary body that acts on decisions made by ministers or Parliament.It is composed of all cabinet members and more than 300 eminent persons selected, for life, by the Queen upon the recommendation of the prime minister. Parliament. The upper house of Parliament is the House of Lords, in which membership is hereditary or by appointment; the lower is the House of Commons, an elective body. ? The House of Lords has more than 1,000 members, consisting of royal princes (who take no active role), hereditary peers and peeresses, spiritual lords (archbishops and senior bishops of the Church of England), and life by the Queen upon the recommendation of the prime minister).The life peers include Lords of Appeal, jurists who serve as justices when the House functions as a court of appeal (Crowl, 2002). All hereditary Scottish peers are entitled to seats in the house of lords, but Irish peers ate excluded unless they hold peerage s of Great Britain or the United Kingdom. Only about 150 members actually attend. The House of Lords has limited power. It can neither reject nor amend legislation dealing with finances, but can delay other kinds of legislation for one year. The House of Lords thus serves as a check on hasty action by the Commons. Members of the House of Commons, called members of Parliament (M.P. ’s) are elected by universal adult suffrage. Parliament cannot sit indefinitely, but must be dissolved at least once every five years. General elections are called after it is dissolved (Coleman, 2006). The prime minister is responsible for determining when a general election is held and may call for one at any time within the five-year period. One member is elected from each of 635 constituencies (electoral districts determined by population). A member does not have to live in the constituency from which he is elected. A by-election is held within an individual constituency when a vacancy occurs (R andle, 2001).The political party or coalition of parties holding the majority of seats in the House of Commons provides the prime minister, usually the acknowledged party leader. The prime minister chooses the other ministers of the Crown and designates certain ones to be members of the cabinet. A small number of ministers are taken from the House of Lords, the majority from the Commons. The largest minority party in the House of Commons leads the official Opposition. The House of Commons normally adopts the bills proposed by the government and affirms its program.However, if the government follows a course displeasing to the House of Commons, a vote of confidence is taken (Randle, 2001). If it is negative, the government must resign. Generally, Parliament is then dissolved and a general election is held. The Cabinet and the Ministry. Under the leadership of the prime minister, the cabinet and the ministry perform the executive functions in the British government. The cabinet is com posed of the most important ministers, usually not more than 20. The ministry includes all heads of administrative departments.Some are known as secretaries of state, some as ministers, and some by special titles, such as the Chancellor of the Exchequer. There are also ministers who are not department heads. Other members of the ministry are the Lord Chancellor and law officers (Morgan, 2004), deputy ministers known as ministers of state, and junior ministers known as parliamentary secretaries or undersecretaries of state. Judicial System. The House of Lords is the highest court of appeal for civil cases and for certain criminal cases. The Supreme Court of Judicature, composed of the High Court of Justice and the Court of Appeal, deals with important civil cases.Minor cases are tried in county courts. Criminal cases may be appealed to the Court of Criminal Appeal, after being tried in assize courts or magistrates’ courts (Morgan, 2004). Trial by jury is used for all but minor crimes. Administration of the judicial system is shared by the Lord Chancellor and the home secretary, both members of the cabinet. Defense. The three branches of British armed forces are the army, the Royal Air Force, and the Royal Navy (which includes the Royal marines). Civilian control is exercised by the secretaries of state of war and air and the first lord of the admiralty (Randle, 2001).All three are responsible to the minister of defense, a member of the cabinet. o Turkey The Republic of Turkey was proclaimed in 1923, with Kemal Atturk as its first president. Far-reaching political, social, and economic reforms were put into effect. Ataturk abolished the sultanate and later exiled all Ottoman heirs. He did away with old traditions associated with the empire—men could no longer wear the fez (a hat), nor women the veil. Women were given political and civil rights equal to those of men. Church and state were separated (Spencer, 2003) , and the property of the mosques n ationalized.Universal education and a new law code were introduced. When many of these changes were not accepted by the people, Ataturk assumed unlimited dictatorial powers. After his death in 1938, the premier, Ismet Inonu, was elected president. By the Montreux Cinvention of 1936, Turkey was given the right to fortify the Dardanelles and Bosporus straits. Treaties of alliance were signed with Great Britain and France in 1939. During World War II, Turkey remained neutral until 1944, when it broke relations with Germany (Weiker, 2001). The following year, it declared war on Germany and Japan. Government.Turkey has been a republic since 1923 as mentioned earlier. Under the constitution to the Third Republic (1982), executive power is vested in the president, legislative power in the National Assembly, and judicial power in independent course. The president (head of state) is chosen by the national Assembly for a seven-year term. He is assisted by a state advisory council, composed of former presidents and military chiefs of staff. From among the national Assembly (Hale, 2001), the president appoints a prime minister (head of government0, who in turn selects the other ministers to form the Council of Ministers (cabinet).The national Assembly is composed of 450 deputies popularly elected for five-year terms. The president has the power to dissolve the national Assembly and rule under emergency powers. The judicial system consists of civil, administrative, military, and constitutional courts. The regular civil courts include courts of first instance (courts having original jurisdiction), central criminal courts, and commercial courts. The highest tribunal is the court of cassation, which is a court of appeals (Weiker, 2001). Local Government. Turkey is divided into 67 administrative divisions it calls ils, each named for its chief city.An il is subdivided into ilces, and these in turn into bucaks. At the head of each il are a governor, representing the central gov ernment, and an elected council. Military Affairs. Turkey maintains a regular army, navy, and air force. In addition, there is the Jandarma, a rural police force. Military service is compulsory for all men after the age of 20 for a 20-month period. B. Difference of absolute monarchy, constitutional monarchy and republic. Absolute monarchy pertains to the absolute power of the king or queen as the ruler of the country.The power has bestowed in him/her to do the things he/she wishes to do. On the other hand, constitutional monarchy is under the ruling of the king however it’s accompanied with the constitution. The king or queen cannot decide for himself/herself or make any moves which are not written under the constitution (Bogdanor, 1997). Every decision should be in line in the constitution of the said country. When we say republic, it pertains to a country in which both the head of the state and the members of the legislature are elected directly or indirectly by the people. Most of the nations of the world today, including the United States and the Soviet Union, are republics. The rest, in most instances, are monarchies, in which the head of the state (a king, queen, or prince) comes into office through inheritance. III. Conclusion In conclusion, many people are not happy under these kinds of monarchies because they don’t see the function of the royal families anymore. People are all feed up and see that monarchies are a way of showing selfishness to power because only the blood line of the king or queen can inherit the throne and not giving a chance to others.In 1980 in Turkey, after renewed violence between political factions, the armed forces seized control of the government, disbanded parliament, suspended the constitution, and established a ruling junta of military officers. Within two year, the junta achieved political stability and eased some of the coutnry’s economic difficulties. Reference: 1. Bogdanor, Vernon (1997). The Monarch y and the Constitution. Clarendon Press. : Oxford. 2. Coleman, Francis (2006). Great Britain: the Land and Its People (MacDonald). 3. Crowl, P. A. (2002). The Intelligent Traveler’s Guide to Historic Britain (St.Martin’s Press). 4. Hale, William (2001). The Political and Economic Development of Modern Turkey (St. Martin’s Press). 5. Morgan, K. O. (2004). The oxford Illustrated History of Britain (Oxford University). 6. Randle, John. (2001). Understanding Britain: a History of the British People and Their Culture (Basil Blackwell). 7. Spencer, William (2003). The Land and People of Turkey, revised edition (Harper & Row). 8. Weiker, W. F. (2001). The Modernization of Turkey: from Ataturk to the present Day (Holmes & Meier). 9. Winter, Gordon (2003). The Country Life Picture Book of Britain (Norton

“Cat Bill” Analysis Essay

In his statement of veto of the â€Å"Cat Bill,† Governor Stevenson manifests sarcastic diction to appeal to common sense and knowledge, and uses examples of personification and dramatization to craft his effective argument ridiculing the bill. Governor Stevenson organizes his veto using common knowledge so that anyone of any background can comprehend his reasoning. He implies the impracticality of the bill by juxtaposing the basic effects it would have on both owners and the cats themselves. He uses subtle mockery by portraying cats as innocent and attributing their roaming behavior as a part of their nature. He depicts the cats to be naturally unbounded and indicates the absurdity of an owner trying to domestic them to the degree of escorting them on a leash. He predicts what possible conflicts passing this bill create, and the specific effects the bill would have on different areas, such as farms, villages, and cities. Stevenson even alludes to the writers of the bill to simply dislike cats, sarcastically calling the entire roaming cats situation as a â€Å"worthy cause to which its proponents give such unselfish effort.† Through his arguments relevant and understandable to anyone, Governor Stevenson is able to re veal the absurdity of the proposal, and allows his point to be clearly stated. Stevenson’s use of comparison and personification are additives to the overall effective of his veto. He plays on cats’ natural rights, creating a sense of justice versus injustice. He creates an almost eerie setting by measuring the liberty of cats to humans. By using words such as â€Å"capture† and â€Å"imprison,† the reader receives emotions of sympathy towards cats, unable to agree with the injustice they receive. Stevenson uses words of contempt, such as â€Å"hunt† and â€Å"traps,† to stir readers’ emotions to believe how evil and pagan-like these â€Å"zealous citizens† are behaving. He creates a picture of an implausible situation, such as a â€Å"cat on a leash,† allowing the reader to see how inconceivable it is. Stevenson uses examples of impossibility like these to serve his purpose – to show his reasoning behind his disapproval of the bill. Governor Stevenson created a veto that contained sufficient reasoning behind his disapproval, using techniques of organization and personification. Through his argument, he is able to obtain the reader’s sympathy towards cats. His writing is perceivable and effective in gaining the audience’s understanding.

Functionalism And Machine Aesthetic Of Modern Architecture Architecture Essay

Functionalism in Architecture was a motion during the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century was a merchandise of one American designer Louis Henri Sullivan who coined the term â€Å" signifier follows map. It was Distinct to hold exposed architecture of the being of ornamentation and hence aesthetics so that a construction merely expressed its intent or map. Both in the United States and in Europe, functionalism and machine aesthetics became existing due to the development of the epoch. During the 1920s and early 1930s in the United States, there was a turning automated civilization. The machine ‘s influence on art and architecture reflected the machine ‘s detonation as a valuable signifier of aesthetic. Both Functionalism and machine aesthetics held its ain influence in modern architecture. The reaching of the machine was to hold such radical significance that the undermentioned old ages can lawfully be termed the Machine Age. Among the great figure of cultural alterations engendered by this new epoch was the installing of a machine aesthetic in the Fieldss of architecture and design. This was of cardinal importance to the Modern Movement as it provided a agencies by which its practicians could prosecute with what they regarded as the spirit of the age. The machine aesthetic can be distinguished in the work of each major figure of the Modernist pantheon ; it hence conditioned the full scope of Modernist activity. By using these facets, the ornamentation and unneeded signifiers of designs were obliterated and alternatively replaced by a plainer but functional expression. Despite the turning motion of functionalism and machine aesthetics during the early twentieth century, there still lie the differences and comparings between the uses, positions, and thoughts about them from America and Europe. The difference of the two topographic points someway manifested assorted attacks towards the subject. The machine was valued for its service. Its aesthetic was promoted by those who saw a beauty in the machine — a beauty in visual aspect and map. The machine aesthetic was assumed by all kinds of objects. The expression of the machine was non universally celebrated, yet it was widespread however Despite this consistence, the grounds why single Modernists employed the aesthetic varied greatly, and to reason that they did so merely to arouse the current Zeitgeist would barely look satisfactory. Alternatively, the purpose of this essay is to analyze functionalism and the several utilizations made of the machine aesthetic in order to find why it was so cardinal to Modernist theory and pattern. Since the peculiar character of the aesthetic varied harmonizing to the nature of the involvement in it ( e.g. political, economic ) , the grounds for its usage are cardinal to any apprehension of Modernism. First, the thought that Modernism embraced the machine aesthetic in order to give concrete signifier to the spirit of the age, though non the exclusive motive behind Modernist motion is valid in itself and deserves to be expounded. The Industrial Revolution precipitated a series of huge alterations which can be understood to hold truly transformed the universe. These include industrialization, the rise of the city, an attach toing diminution in ruralise, and rapid technological advancement. In being plundered for their natural resources, even Third World states felt the impact of the new epoch. For many these alterations threatened to make an environment that was both foreign and hostile to humanity and nature. In the cultural domain, the nineteenth-century design reformists John Ruskin and William Morris attacked machine-production for disheartenment the trade accomplishments and individualism of the worker. Since the machine took both tradition and single effort, it would go impossible for the creative person or craftsman to take pride in their work, and the consumer, in bend, would endure the religious disadvantages of no longer life in an environment that had been fondly crafted.1 As a neutralizer, Ruskin, Morris and others proposed a return to traditional trade procedures and beginnings of inspiration that were chiefly mediaeval. In other sectors, this reactionist step was felt to be unrealistically hidebound. Since the machine was, as Ruskin and Morris had argued, incompetent at fiting traditional trade procedures and designs, those who recognised that the machine was an beyond uncertainty world were cognizant of the demand to germinate a new aesthetic that it was suited to. This would re-establish a high criterion of quality in design and guarantee that designed goods were adjusted to the age, instead than being hopelessly evangelist. One such figure was Adolph Loos, whose essay ‘Ornament and Crime ‘ ( 1908 ) argued that using ornament to a designed merchandise was both inefficient and condemnable, because finally it resulted in the use of the craftsman: ‘If I pay every bit much for a smooth box as for a adorned one, the difference in labour belongs to the worker. ‘2 Alternatively, the new aesthetic was to be derived from the new procedures of mass production. The consequence was a simple, essentialist manner that was based on geometry ( particularly the consecutive line and the right angle3 ) . Geometry became a theoretical account, non merely because geometrical signifiers were theoretically easier for the machine to put to death, but besides because of overtones that Plato, amongst others, had invested it with. In Plato ‘s doctrine, geometrical signifiers were beautiful because they were elements of the ageless and absolute ‘world of thoughts ‘ that existed beyond stuff world. The most conjunct effort to joint this manner was given in an exhibition on â€Å" Modern Architecture † at the Museume of Modern Art in 1932.A The International Style: Architecture Since 1922A accompanied the exhibition. Historian Henry-Russell Hitchcock and critic Philip Johnson outlined the rules of the â€Å" International † manner: The thought of manner as the frame of possible growing, instead than as a fixed and oppressing mold, has developed with the acknowledgment of underlying rules such as designers discern in the great manners of the yesteryear. The rules are few and wide. . . . There is, foremost, a new construct of architecture as volume instead than mass. Second, regularity instead than axial symmetricalness serves as the main agencies of telling design. These two rules, with a 3rd proscribing arbitrary applied ornament, tag the productions of the international style.4 Progresss in building techniques and stuffs allowed for a displacement in structural support. Whereas walls were one time weight-bearing, and therefore monolithic, support was now given by skeletal infrastuctures. This alteration provided greater flexibleness in window arrangement ; one time nil more than holes cut in a wall, they could now be located virtually anyplace. Therefore, advocates of the International manner, the architectural equivalent of machine pureness, moved Windowss away from walls ‘ Centres, lest they suggest traditional building. Armed with these new possibilities, asymmetrical designs were encouraged, as â€Å" map in most types of modern-day edifice is more straight expressed in asymmetrical forms.5A Ideally, constructions were non to be randomly asymmetrical, but it was assumed that the demands of occupants and the intents of different infinites in the edifices would non bring forth symmetrical designs — in fact, arbitrary dissymmetry would be a cosmetic device, and therefore an bete noire to the Internationalists. Machine pureness was a reaction against the ornamentation of old decennaries and even the Moderns. Honesty in usage and stuffs was sought — maps should non be concealed beneath a covering, and points should n't be presented as something they were non. Simplicity and asepsis championed the pure white of the infirmary and lab. Stucco was an ideal stuff, as it provided for unbroken, uninterrupted surfaces. Walls were teguments, stripped down and leting for a upper limit of interior infinite. These interior infinites were to be designed separately, fiting the demands of the occupant, to â€Å" supply for the betterment and development of the maps of life. â€Å" 6A Suites were to be determined by map, and the motion between suites was to â€Å" emphasize the integrity and continuity of the whole volume inside a edifice. â€Å" 7A Book shelves and populating workss were the best cosmetic devices in the place.This appealed to Modernists, whose plants and Hagiographas revealed a desire to transcend the pandemonium of impermanent solutions and preoccupation with manners that had characterised nineteenth- century design.The purpose of Modernism was to accomplish the ideal solutions to each design job in plants that would be manner less, timeless and possess the same pureness and lucidity as geometry.Given the widespread belief that the machine symbolised the new century, it was possibly inevitable that certain Modernists should encompass it wholly for its ain interest – strictly as a metaphor, and with no concern for its practical applications. To some extent at least, this tends to be the instance for most canonical Modernists, but this attack is exemplified by the Italian Futurist motion.INCLUDEPICTURE â€Å" hypertext transfer protocol: //factoidz.com/images/user/Boccioni-The_Noise_of_the_Street_detail ( 1 ) .jpg † * MERGEFORMATINETAs this brief analysis indicates, Futurism was chiefly a literary and artistic motion. It was characteristic of its self-contradictory nature that a motion initiated as a response to the altering environment should possess no agencies of look in the art signifier that most straight conditioned the environment – architecture. This was the instance until 1914, five old ages after the publication of the first Manifesto, when Marinetti was eventually able to welcome Antonio Sant ‘ Elia into the ranks.Sant ‘ Elia recognised the city as the environment of the new age, and consequently pioneered designs that were full with hints of the machine aesthetic. His positions for La Citta Nuova ( 1914 ) underscore the geometry and verticalness of his vision by juxtaposing stepped-back subdivisions with sheer verticals. The interaction of diagonals and verticals this produces invests his plant with the same energy and dynamism to be found in model Futurist pictures. In add-on, his edifices are often surmounted by characteristics resembling industrial chimneys or wireless masts ( e.g. Casa gradinata con ascensori, 1914 ) , therefore doing possibly somewhat picturesque usage of an iconography derived from machines. Futurism ‘s involvement in the machine aesthetic arose from a naA?ve and romantic jubilation of the machine for its qualities of energy and dynamism. The machine was hence valued entirely for the expressive potency it offered. Since they failed to hold on its practical facets the Futurists neglected to accommodate their aesthetic to technological restrictions. For this ground Sant ‘ Elia ‘s designs remained on the pulling board. INCLUDEPICTURE â€Å" hypertext transfer protocol: //factoidz.com/images/user/Picture6 ( 6 ) .jpg † * MERGEFORMATINET INCLUDEPICTURE â€Å" hypertext transfer protocol: //factoidz.com/images/user/Picture7 ( 6 ) .jpg † * MERGEFORMATINETA deeper battle with the worlds of the machine was demonstrated by those who embraced the construct of ‘functionalism ‘ . This thought played a important function in most signifiers of Modernist design and theory. The cardinal contention was that the signifier of an object should be dictated by its map. The Bauhaus, for illustration, aimed to ‘originate the design of an object from its natural maps and relationships, '11 so that they could be used efficaciously and were rationally related to each other.Of class, the chase of functionalism complemented the Modernists ‘ purpose to get at ideal design solutions – unless objects fulfilled their intent they could hardly be ideal. This led to the impression that a designed object could be beautiful if, and merely if, it functioned absolutely.Function hence replaced visual aspect as the premier rule of aesthetic quality. Artistic amplification was eschewed in favor of clear signifier that both expressed its intent and ensured that this intent was satisfied. Henry-Russell Hitchcock and Philip Johnson, in their treatment of ‘European functionalist ‘ designers ( i.e. canonical Modernists ) , wrote that, ‘If a edifice provides adequately, wholly and without via media for its intent, it is so a good edifice, irrespective of its visual aspect. '12 Explanation of this slightly extremist position was found in the machine. Since the machine ‘s visual aspect was derived wholly from its map it was both morally and economically admirable, which made it beautiful. Karl Ewald ‘s composing The Beauty of Machines ( 1925-6 ) contained the expression, ‘A good modern machine is aˆÂ ¦ an object of the highest aesthetic value – we are cognizant of that'.13 For grounds of this the Modernists looked to the USA, where an unselfconscious functionalism had been put into pattern by innovators like Samuel Colt and, in peculiar, Henry Ford. Ford brought the construct of standardization to his auto works, with consequences that were seen as about amazing. His traveling meeting line system, which involved specialized phases of fiction and indistinguishable parts, had enabled him to dramatically increase auto production. His success was such that industrialists and makers across the universe were following these methods. Theoretically, their goods were now readily available and continually deprecating in monetary value, even as net incomes soared. Paul Greenhalgh has observed that Modernists recognised the demand to encompass engineering for these grounds of economic system and handiness. It was the agencies by which Modernism could be promoted worldwide. In add-on, the standardization advocated by Ford would ease rapid building and maintenance.14A Therefore, the illustration of Ford and others encouraged the Modernists to see the machine as the absolute ideal of functionalism. This can be confirmed by mention to Le Corbusier. INCLUDEPICTURE â€Å" hypertext transfer protocol: //factoidz.com/images/user/c-11.jpg † * MERGEFORMATINET Much of Le Corbusier ‘s pronunciamento Vers une architecture ( 1923 ) is dedicated to advancing the architectural virtuousnesss of the machine. His celebrated declaration, ‘The house is a machine for life in, '15 frequently misunderstood, meant that the guiding rule for designers should be to do the house as good suited to its intent as was a machine. This reiterated the statement that functionalism was more of import than visual aspect. In order to come on, he believed, it was necessary for designers to abandon the impression of traditional manners and cosmetic effects: ‘Architecture has nil to make with the assorted ‘styles'aˆÂ ¦ [ They are ] sometimes reasonably, though non ever ; and ne'er anything more. '16 this implies that he saw the aesthetic, non as merely another manner, but as the really substance of architecture. Alternatively, he drew analogues between architecture and the ‘Engineer ‘s Aesthetic ‘ , reasoning that applied sc ientists were to be praised for their usage of functionalism and mathematical order. As a effect, designers were encouraged to emulate applied scientists and follow these rules in order to achieve harmoniousness and logic in their designs. To reenforce this statement the illustrations of Vers une architecture celebrated the functional and architectural integrity of Canadian grain shops, ships, airplanes and cars. From a present twenty-four hours perspective his rules are better illuminated by his architecture, since these illustrations ( e.g. the Caproni Triple seaplane ) seem instead old. The Maison Dom-Ino ( 1915 ) was an early illustration of his Engineer ‘s Aesthetic: three indistinguishable planes are suspended above each other by steel columns, a method of building that frees the walls of their supporting intent, and allows his construct of the ‘free facade ‘ to be introduced. An external stairway communicates between each degree, and its location permits an unprecedented infinite and lucidity in the program. The constituents were all to be standardised and pre-fabricated, which would let for rapid building. This house was hence a merchandise of Le Corbusier ‘s purpose to use the rules of mechanical mass production to domestic architecture. INCLUDEPICTURE â€Å" hypertext transfer protocol: //factoidz.com/images/user/VillaSavoye ( 1 ) .jpg † * MERGEFORMATINET However, a significant organic structure of unfavorable judgment ( e.g. Greenhalgh, Sparke ) has argued that this functionalism of Modernist theory was non based in world. The machine aesthetic remained merely that, as few of the designs were capable of being standardised. For illustration, the Grand Comfort chair by Le Corbusier and Charlotte Perriand was neither functional nor standardized. It required no less than 18 dyer's rockets and three stuffs, doing it expensive and capable of production merely by workmanship. Le Corbusier ‘s marquee L'Esprit Nouveau featured door grips purportedly derived from auto or airplane grips. These were non standardised but had to be made separately. INCLUDEPICTURE â€Å" hypertext transfer protocol: //factoidz.com/images/user/05-esprit-nouveau ( 1 ) .jpg † * MERGEFORMATINET At the Bauhaus, Marianne Brandt ‘s tea service ( 1928/30 ) embodies the machine aesthetic with its geometrical, angular signifiers, but, once more, these characteristics made it unsuited to machine production. For this ground, virtually no merchandises of Modernism were mass-produced, at least until the manner was modified and practised on an international degree in what became known as the International Style. For the innovator stage, mass production remained a metaphor that could non yet be emulated.17A farther dimension which has non yet been discussed is the political map of the machine aesthetic.This was hinted at in Loos ‘ belief that it improved the domination of the worker, but here the importance was on the labour-saving potency of the machine. Loos celebrated the aesthetic because, theoretically, it reduced the hours of attempt required of the worker by avoiding unneeded decoration. This line of concluding even occurs in the theories of the politically diffident Le Corbusier, whose Freehold Maisonettes of 1922 used mechanical applications and ‘good administration ‘ derived from machines to cut down the demand for human labor, and therefore relieve the work loads of servants.18 It did non needfully follow in either instance, nevertheless, that the machine could function as an instrument for societal release. INCLUDEPICTURE â€Å" hypertext transfer protocol: //factoidz.com/images/user/Bauhaus.jpg † * MERGEFORMATINET This possibility was non to the full explored until the influence of Modernism had spread and produced a diverseness of practicians. To the progressively machine-orientated Bauhaus Moholy-Nagy imparted his belief that the machine was inextricably linked with socialism because it was an absolute. He wrote: ‘Before the machine, everyone is equal – I can utilize it, so can you. . . There is no tradition in engineering, no consciousness of category or standing. Everybody can be the machine ‘s maestro or slave. '19 This belief was widespread amongst Modernists, with Theo Van Doesburg being another noteworthy advocate. Van Doesburg praised the machine as a medium of societal release, and denied that handcraft possessed this capableness, since handcraft, ‘under the domination of philistinism, '20 reduced work forces to the degree of machines. But as Charles Jencks has observed, Van Doesburg ‘s enthusiasm for the machine went beyond its labour-saving potency, it was besides based upon its ‘universalising, abstract quality. '21 In Jencks ‘ lineation, the machine ‘s impersonality enforces equality between its users, which in art would take to the universal and the abstract. The consequence would be the realization of a corporate manner that was universally valid and comprehendible, based as it was upon the abstract signifiers of the machine. INCLUDEPICTURE â€Å" hypertext transfer protocol: //factoidz.com/images/user/in-de-stijl-van-de-stijl.jpg † * MERGEFORMATINET Paul Greenhalgh suggests that such an internationalism was cardinal to Modernists ‘ theory and was an inevitable status of their pursuit for a ‘universal human consciousness. '22 In order to accomplish this, national boundaries had to be disposed of, every bit good as those between subjects ( such as all right art and design ) and political categories. Greenhalgh confirms that the abstract, geometrical aesthetic appealed to Modernists because it could be used as a common linguistic communication through which different nationalities could get at unvarying solutions, thereby fade outing national boundaries. ‘In its exclusion per Se of linguistic communication, abstraction was the aesthetic which enabled the ethic, internationalism, to be realised. '23 Though he does non utilize the term, the aesthetic Greenhalgh refers to is that of the machine, since it is derived from and ( theoretically ) tailored for machine production. I would therefore argue that Modernists associated the aesthetic with internationalism, non merely because of its abstract quality, but besides because its beginnings in the machine imbued it with the cosmopolitan quality that Moholy-Nagy and Van Doesburg recognised in this beginning.The practical usage of the machine aesthetic ‘s political map is best illustrated by the Russian Constructivist motion.It is possibly surprising that an aesthetic originating from the machine – the foundation of capitalist economy – could boom in the political clime following the Communist revolution. Loos ‘ thought of the machine as labour-saving device was, of class, cardinal in deciding this quandary, as was the societal release and classlessness revealed by Van Doesburg and Moholy-Nagy. Besides instrum ental, no uncertainty, was the fact that, in this epoch, Russia was still mostly a rural, peasant state possessing no heavy industry. The negative facets of the machine would hence hold been less obvious than the myths of its glorious effects. In this clime of rural poorness and political excitement, the machine seemed capable of transforming society, and the aesthetic became the perfect metaphor for revolution and nation-wide advancement. Since this made the aesthetic an priceless resource for Communist propaganda, many of the taking interior decorators were commissioned to make plants that mythologized the revolution. Significantly, this state of affairs did non merely affect the authorities pull stringsing design to its ain terminals ; many of the creative persons and interior decorators were every bit committed to the thought that they could function the new society. The Constructivist motion was so named because its members saw it as their undertaking to ‘construct ‘ the environment for a new society in the same manner that applied scientists constructed Bridgess and so on.25 Proletkult promoted the integrity of scientific discipline, industry, and art: Vladimir Tatlin, for illustration, believed design was linked to technology, and saw the interior decorator as an anon. worker edifice for society.26 Tatlin ‘s Monument to the Third International ( 1919-20 ) reflects this ethos. This projection for a 400m tall tower ( merely a scaled-down theoretical account was built ) clearly represents the brotherhood of art and building – its sculptural signifier of two entwining spirals and a surging diagonal constituent is rendered in a lattice building suggestive of technology. Equally good as resembling a machine, the tower really functioned as one: it featured four transparent volumes that rotated at different velocities ( annually, monthly, day-to-day and hourly ) . These were intended to house authorities offices for statute law, disposal, information and cinematic projection. It should be pointed out that none of these grounds for involvement in the machine aesthetic were reciprocally sole, and single Modernists did non adhere to it for any individual ground. Each partook, to some extent, of most of them. The enthusiasm of the European Functionalists besides involved the political involvement observed in Constructivism. At the same clip, an component of the Futurists ‘ romantic captivation can be detected in the thought of Le Corbusier, the Bauhaus, and all those for whom mass production remained out of range. In decision, as instance after instance demonstrates, the Modernists ‘ enthusiasm for the machine aesthetic continued to be of an ideological instead than a practical nature. The machine was embraced as an thought by interior decorators who failed to hold on the worlds of mass production. Since their aesthetic was hence inspired by the machine but non adapted to it, in many instances this really impeded its realization. This is highlighted by the illustrations of Futurism, Constructivism and even facets of the Bauhaus, where legion strategies could non be put into practice.A However, the importance of the machine aesthetic within Modernism should non be underestimated ; it was practised so widely, so constituted an International Style, exactly because it was deemed to be the ideal and most logical manner of gaining the cardinal dogmas upon which Modernism was founded. These included truth, internationalism, map, expiation with the age, and so on. The belief that the aesthetic w as universally valid is reflected by the great assortment of utilizations to which it was applied, such as Utopian, political, economic etc. For this ground it is no hyperbole to state that, for the Modernists, it was non a inquiry of aesthetics at all, but of a Machine Ethic.

Human Resource Management Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4250 words

Human Resource Management - Assignment Example nvolved (A Managers Responsibility and Liability in Health and Safety, 2008) Having an effective leadership team and effective workforce management will help the organization in protecting and safeguarding the interest of the employees. The indispensable and critical principles are- An effective leadership management team who play an active role towards assimilating strong health and safety management. Workforce involvement in promoting and achieving high safety conditions in work environment Frequent follow-ups, monitoring, and reviewing the performance of the safety measures (Health safety executive, n.d) Effects of poor health and safety measures- In 2006, approximately 30 million working days were lost due to poor health conditions and physical injuries to the employees. Approximately 200 employees are killed each year due to poor and negligent health and safety measures at work places in companies Many employees reported each year with respiratory diseases and cancers due to occ upational illness (Health safety executive, n.d) Benefits of good health measures: Reduced cost and reduced risks Low employee turnover and employee absence which improves productivity indirectly Corporate responsibility among clients, partners Do you think managers should be held liable for health and safety violations? Protecting the health and safety of the employees should be one of the main focuses of the risk management team in any organization. Health and Safety plays an integral and fundamental part of the organization’s success. Management, board members and the leadership team who do not show any focus in this area would never be able to achieve the highest achievement of health and safety management and should be penalized. Failure on the part of the management to incorporate... This essay focuses on the analysis of the Human Resources department, that usually helps in organizing and deals with any issues related to compensation, safety, policies, wellness settlement, general administration, training and development. The researcher mentiones that they are also expected to add value to the employees. Health and safety law basically safeguard the welfare of employees and the general public. This law holds the person, company or organization liable for any employee injured through accident at work or death of any employee. The Health and safety team can execute a criminal prosecution against the company, which may result in penalty or imprisonment against the company management and human resources department. The affected employee can also seek for damages in the civil court. The role of the human resource team should have a health and safety program clearly defined and stated. Some of the areas that human resources should examine and supervise are management a nd employee training on health and Safety measures to prevent work related injuries and illnesses and ensuring workplace safety culture is being driven to ensure safety of the employees working onsite. The researcher then concludes that having an effective Health and Safety department has become very important from a commercial and a governmental viewpoint of the company. Many high profile safety negligence cases over the last few years have been mostly caused by bad management team in the company.

The case of banjo jones and his blog Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

The case of banjo jones and his blog - Essay Example A second important fact of this case is that the writer of the web blog, Steve Olafson, was a journalist working for the Houston Chronicle. This is important because Mr. Olafson was a very talented writer that brought to the public very great information. He was able to provide powerful insights and opinions which other normal blogs lacked since many webmasters did not have the education and years of experienced Steve possessed. Many politicians, business owners and other publishing houses wanted to know the identity of Bango Jones. A third key fact of the case was that Mr. Olafson was fired by the Houston Chronicle for expressing his opinions on the internet. The newspaper violated Steve’s freedom of speech, which is very ironic since newspapers are in business because of freedom of speech protections. A missing fact in this case is whether the claim that Steve used the blog to constantly attack politicians and institutions such as Dennis restaurant were true. The majority of the material of the website was column writing in which Steve’s prefer topics were stories about neighborhood kids, baseball and other sport coverage (Orlowski, 2002). Another important missing fact is the ultimate consequence of Steve actions. Did he ever serve jail time for his alleged bridge of confidentiality? The answer is no, Steve served jailed time around that time for an unrelated matter concerning protection of a source from the Eastern Post, a decision which was later overturned by the judge (Orlowski, 2002). A third missing fact is if Steve Olafson and the Houston Chronicles became enemies. They did not become enemies. Three years later the new administration at the Houston Chronicles created a corporate web blog and included Steve’s blog as a link within the website claiming that St eve Olafson was a great journalist and reporter (Jossip,

Wireless Security Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Wireless Security - Research Paper Example On the other hand, there are countless security and privacy issues also emerging in wireless networking environments. Though, the new technologies require more and more high level application of wireless communication networks, but such implementations are being established without giving significant concentration to privacy and security related issues. Consequently, the majority of wireless networks around the world are in danger regarding security and safety. Thus, there are a lot of chances that someone with appropriate equipment could be able to spy network traffic. In this scenario, they can get access to users’ passwords and other data (Gerkis, 2006; The State University of New Jersey, 2006). In addition, these security issues and attacks are not immediately theoretical. Additionally, techniques and tools to tap near wireless networks are extensively accessible, even for palmtop devices (Gerkis, 2006; The State University of New Jersey, 2006). In this situation there is vital need for implementing wireless security. Wireless security management has turned out to be a hot issue in literature. This paper presents a detailed analysis of wireless security related issues and their management. This research will analyze some of the important aspects of wireless security, main challenges and possible mitigation techniques. TECHNOLOGY INVOLVED IN WIRELESS NETWORKS Consider the fact that users of WLAN (wireless local area network) are able to travel along with their laptop computers and other devices from one location to another inside their offices or houses without breaking the link with the network. Thus, many corporations and general public at the present think that wireless communication based devices are very useful, efficient, and easy to operate. On the other hand, personal networks based on wireless technology help users receive and distribute data, as well as software applications, by making use of network systems and other users of the network with well-matched devices, without establishing a connection to printer cables and other secondary device links. In fact, with wireless networking users of small PDA, hand-held devices and cell phones can effectively coordinate data and information among PDAs and personal computers, as well as are able to effectively make use of internet based services l ike that web browsing, email and internet access. In addition, wireless communications can help individuals and business firms reduce their networking or wiring costs (Radack, 2011; Gerkis, 2006; css-security, 2010). In this scenario, Information Technology Laboratory established by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), presents various standards and measures which can be adopted to enhance safety and security of wireless communication networks. Additionally, National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication (SP) 800-48,  Wireless Network Security, 802.11, Bluetooth, and Hand-held Devices, whose authors were Les Owens and Tom Karygiannis, outlines 3 main and fundamental aspects of wireless security: (Radack, 2011; Ge